32 or 64??
grey at dmiyu.org
Tue Feb 2 04:59:39 UTC 2010
On 01/31/2010 10:02 AM, Ari Torhamo wrote:
> Why don't we just tell those who want to know the benefits and possible
> (real and present day) problems with using 64-bit Ubuntu.
That is what was done and it was called FUD! Have you gone back to the
original message to see what was actually said? The person said 4Gb+ better
off with 64-bit but 32-bit is a safer bet. He then added that no matter which
choice he was sure the person he was talking to would be happy.
Let that sink in for a second. He pointed out the benefits of 64-bit.
He pointed out, rightly, that the safer bet is 32-bit (this was explained by
me, in a message a few days ago) and he further left the choice to the user
with a blessing for *both*.
That was called FUD. If someone is over-reacting it is the people
playing the FUD harp.
More information about the ubuntu-users