Interesting read about the future of Ubuntu

Robert Holtzman holtzm at cox.net
Mon Dec 27 05:09:23 UTC 2010


On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 07:38:33PM +0000, Avi Greenbury wrote:
> Robert Holtzman wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 05:41:53PM +1100, Basil Chupin wrote:
> > > On 26/12/2010 07:05, Robert Holtzman wrote:.
> > Leadership is one thing. Autocracy is another.
> > 
> 
> So far, Autocracy appears to be the 'better' option :)

In terms of what?
 
> 
> Mark's 'autocracy' is quite unuique amongst distributions, and Ubuntu
> (as a distribution aimimg for market share) is pretty high among the
> most popular distributions

If "better" is to be measured in terms of popularity, we all know what
would win.....and it sure ain't a linux distro. That doesn't make it
better in any way that matters to me. 

> - anyone not wanting to be involved in an
> autocratically-lead distro would surely find themselves involved in a
> more *cratic one, depending on their preference?

Example?

-- 
Bob Holtzman
Key ID: 8D549279
"If you think you're getting free lunch,
 check the price of the beer"
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20101226/c9e999c7/attachment.sig>


More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list