anyone else notice that pre-release 10.10 is sloooooow?

[Ric Moore]

On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 00:08 +1000, Basil Chupin wrote:
> On 31/08/2010 23:56, Colin Law wrote:
> > On 31 August 2010 14:50, Jordon Bedwell<jordon at envygeeks.com>  wrote:
> >    
> >> On 08/31/2010 08:43 AM, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
> >>      
> >>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Robert P. J. Day<rpjday at crashcourse.ca>  wrote:
> >>>
> >>>        
> >>>> Â ok, i'm confused ... what is it about the phrase "pre-release" that
> >>>> seems so baffling to some people?
> >>>>          
> >>> Pre-release means a release candidate version of a OS or a beta
> >>> version (in some cases) afaik and maverick beta is releasing on sep 2
> >>> :)
> >>>
> >>> regards
> >>>
> >>>        
> >> Well, since they like to sometimes follow in the steps of upstream maybe
> >> they'll do the whole, probably not gonna happen deal with us this round
> >> since Debian just did it to us. Â I was sad panda since I was eager to
> >> get my production servers up to date with some libs and remove a lot of
> >> system compiles, it would also kill a lot of my client repos.
> >>      
> > I know we have to make allowances for those for whom English is not
> > their first language, but I cannot make any sense of the above
> > statement at all.
> >    
> 
> It makes perfect sense if you stick a Babel Fish in your ear-hole and 
> have also had a few bongs.
> 
> Perfectly clear to me :-) .

Of course, you live upside-down, down-under. I'm not surprised it made
sense. :) Ric


-- 
My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say:
"There are two Great Sins in the world...
..the Sin of Ignorance, and the Sin of Stupidity.
Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad.
Linux user# 44256