anyone else notice that pre-release 10.10 is sloooooow?

Tue Aug 31 14:46:23 UTC 2010

On Wed, 1 Sep 2010, Basil Chupin wrote:

> On 01/09/2010 00:17, Colin Law wrote:
> > On 31 August 2010 15:08, Basil Chupin<blchupin at iinet.net.au>  wrote:
> >
> >> On 31/08/2010 23:56, Colin Law wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 31 August 2010 14:50, Jordon Bedwell<jordon at envygeeks.com>  Â wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> ...
> >>>> Well, since they like to sometimes follow in the steps of upstream maybe
> >>>> they'll do the whole, probably not gonna happen deal with us this round
> >>>> since Debian just did it to us. Ã‚ I was sad panda since I was eager to
> >>>> get my production servers up to date with some libs and remove a lot of
> >>>> system compiles, it would also kill a lot of my client repos.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> I know we have to make allowances for those for whom English is not
> >>> their first language, but I cannot make any sense of the above
> >>> statement at all.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> It makes perfect sense if you stick a Babel Fish in your ear-hole and
> >> have also had a few bongs.
> >>
> > Can I borrow your fish?
> >
> So you have your own bong-er and only want the Fish, eh? :-)
>
> You can get the Fish at any local fishmonger if you ask him nicely and
> also give him several bongs :-) .

  *sigh*.  why do you need a vogon constructor fleet when you have the
ubuntu users mailing list?

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                               Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

        Top-notch, inexpensive online Linux/OSS/kernel courses
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================