anyone else notice that pre-release 10.10 is sloooooow?

[Colin Law]

On 31 August 2010 15:09, Jordon Bedwell <jordon at envygeeks.com> wrote:
> On 08/31/2010 08:56 AM, Colin Law wrote:
>> On 31 August 2010 14:50, Jordon Bedwell <jordon at envygeeks.com> wrote:
>>> On 08/31/2010 08:43 AM, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday at crashcourse.ca> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  ok, i'm confused ... what is it about the phrase "pre-release" that
>>>>> seems so baffling to some people?
>>>>
>>>> Pre-release means a release candidate version of a OS or a beta
>>>> version (in some cases) afaik and maverick beta is releasing on sep 2
>>>> :)
>>>>
>>>> regards
>>>>
>>>
>>> Well, since they like to sometimes follow in the steps of upstream maybe
>>> they'll do the whole, probably not gonna happen deal with us this round
>>> since Debian just did it to us.  I was sad panda since I was eager to
>>> get my production servers up to date with some libs and remove a lot of
>>> system compiles, it would also kill a lot of my client repos.
>>
>> I know we have to make allowances for those for whom English is not
>> their first language, but I cannot make any sense of the above
>> statement at all.
>>
>> Colin
>>
>
> Says the guy who said "for those for whom" instead of "for those whom"?

I think the former is correct actually, but I don't really feel
strongly enough to argue about it.

> Fail troll is fail.

I think I really need that fish.

Colin