anyone else notice that pre-release 10.10 is sloooooow?
blchupin at iinet.net.au
Tue Aug 31 14:08:11 UTC 2010
On 31/08/2010 23:56, Colin Law wrote:
> On 31 August 2010 14:50, Jordon Bedwell<jordon at envygeeks.com> wrote:
>> On 08/31/2010 08:43 AM, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Robert P. J. Day<rpjday at crashcourse.ca> wrote:
>>>> Â ok, i'm confused ... what is it about the phrase "pre-release" that
>>>> seems so baffling to some people?
>>> Pre-release means a release candidate version of a OS or a beta
>>> version (in some cases) afaik and maverick beta is releasing on sep 2
>> Well, since they like to sometimes follow in the steps of upstream maybe
>> they'll do the whole, probably not gonna happen deal with us this round
>> since Debian just did it to us. Â I was sad panda since I was eager to
>> get my production servers up to date with some libs and remove a lot of
>> system compiles, it would also kill a lot of my client repos.
> I know we have to make allowances for those for whom English is not
> their first language, but I cannot make any sense of the above
> statement at all.
It makes perfect sense if you stick a Babel Fish in your ear-hole and
have also had a few bongs.
Perfectly clear to me :-) .
Vulgar language is the linguistic crutch of inarticulate people.
More information about the ubuntu-users