Ubuntu or Red-Hat for servers?

[Christopher Chan]

On Thursday, August 26, 2010 06:00 AM, M. Milanuk wrote:
> On 8/25/2010 11:31 AM, Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
>> On 25 August 2010 19:09, Angus MacGyver
>> <macgyver at calibre-solutions.co.uk>  wrote:
>>> As for Centos .... spit.
>>> Wouldn't touch it with the dirty end of someone else's toilet brush.
>> I have a couple of comments on some bits of your last mail.
>>
>> CentOS has nothing to do with Fedora. I'm suprised that yo\u say RHEL
>> is OK in one paragraph and then bad mouth CentOS when they're the same
>> code&  patch, just compiled&  packaged by different entities.
>
> And therein lies the difference...
>
> The people running the Fedora project seem at least reasonably friendly,
> their site in general and forum in particular are useful and not broken.
>   CentOS on the other hand... you don't *DARE* suggest that things could
> use some improvement.  The people 'in charge' apparently don't have much
> use for such things, and could care less what new users might think.

Huh? If you are asking for bug/security fixes, they won't. The entire 
premise of CentOS is to be identical to RHEL save for trademarked material.