This used to be a great list
chris
chevhq at gmail.com
Wed Aug 25 04:51:19 UTC 2010
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 18:54 -0700, daniel mcfarland wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Karl Larsen <klarsen1 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> On 08/24/2010 03:53 PM, ms wrote:
> > On 24/08/10 19:43, daniel mcfarland wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Jordon
> Bedwell<jordon at envygeeks.com>wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 8/24/2010 12:50 PM, Ric Moore wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 10:23 -0700, daniel mcfarland
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> I disagree. This has never been a good list.
> >>>>>
> >>>> I haven't seen anyone go begging for assistance on this
> list. Ever. Ric
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> I have to agree, most of what this list contains is
> simplistic issues
> >>> and opinion searches.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> ubuntu-users mailing list
> >>> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> >>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> >>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
> >>>
> >>>
> >> I agree. I'd wager that about 99.999999% of these
> topics and questions
> >> could be answered
> >> just by doing a bit of googling.
> >>
> >> IMHO, it would probably be more productive to teach the
> people that ask
> >> these questions
> >> how to google rather than to propagate the idiocy of
> asking when you
> >> should be looking.
> >>
> >>
> > Could not agree more.
> >
> > I was used to the Gentoo user mailing list. The technical
> level on that
> > list is vastly superior, the answers are usually much more
> knowledgeable
> > and precise, and the discussion offers much more insight.
> The Debian
> > mailing list is also similar.
> >
> > Gentoo however is a peculiar beast, suited to such an
> audience. I fully
> > understand that Ubuntu caters to a different, much less
> skilled
> > audience, and it is a proof of its success that people like,
> ehm, our 73
> > friend can nonetheless use it successfully.
> >
> > However this doesn't justify dumbing down the level of the
> list. That's
> > why in the other thread I advocated banning an user from the
> list. Not
> > because I have anything personal against the user in
> question, nor
> > because *I* don't want to read the messages (something that
> a simple
> > filter on my end can do), but because it pollutes the level
> of the list.
> >
> > We should be less shy of telling people to learn searching
> the
> > information they need, and we should sometimes even answer
> STFG or RTFM,
> > like in the old way. That's how people learns. We should
> teach people to
> > learn, first. And we shouldn't be shy of keeping the list
> level high,
> > even if sometimes this means pruning some particularly
> pollutant user or
> > if it means to refuse to answer a question when it can be
> answered by
> > simple googling.
> >
> > m.
> >
> >
>
> You can sum up this long message with "shoot Karl" and
> tell
> everyone to stop complaining and use Google. This sounds fine
> but it has
> flaws, like some new users can't use Google. You need to Help
> them!
>
>
> 73 Karl
>
>
> --
>
> Karl F. Larsen, AKA K5DI
> Linux User
> #450462 http://counter.li.org.
> Key ID = 3951B48D
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
>
>
> ZOMG if you can't use google you shouldn't have a keyboard.
>
>
>
>
and if you can't snip, you shouldn't post
--
Just my 2c's worth
Cheers the kiwi
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list