Ubuntu or Red-Hat for servers?
Victor Padro
vpadro at gmail.com
Tue Aug 24 21:07:54 UTC 2010
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 4:00 PM, daniel mcfarland
<daniel.mcfarland at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> RedHat, obviously. Because, this is a REDHAT distribution list.
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Maxime Alarie <malarie at processia.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Whats your picks?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ubuntu-users mailing list
>> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
>>
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
>
>
Offtopic:
What are talking about?
This is the Ubuntu list! :P J/K
Ontopic:
Red Hat is a little more commercial than Ubuntu Server, neither way
you have to tell us what services/applications might run on that
server.
Although I prefer Debian for servers.
Cheers,
--
Linux User #452368
http://twitter.com/vpadro
"Everything that irritates us about others can lead us to an
understanding of ourselves"
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list