Karl - grub2 and ext2/ext3/ext4

[Tom H]

On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Jordon Bedwell <jordon at envygeeks.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 06:27 -0600, Karl Larsen wrote:
>>          It's a shame that Ubuntu version 10.04 works so well. You
>> install, update and then just use it. Maybe this is because it is a LTS
>> version?
>
> Generally yes it's because it's LTS.

I saw a post before 10.04 was published by a Ubuntu developer who, in
replying to whether a certain version of an application would be
included, said that given that 10.04 was an LTS version, they were
being more conservative than for other releases.

That said, I don't think that LTS can be considered "stable" in the
same way that Debian and Red Hat publish stable versions, simply
because an LTS edition is much more cutting edge when it is published
than a Debian or Red Hat stable edition.