help me about language-pack-en
Basil Chupin
blchupin at iinet.net.au
Wed Aug 4 10:14:26 UTC 2010
On 04/08/2010 17:37, ning luwen wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Basil Chupin<blchupin at iinet.net.au> wrote:
>
>> On 04/08/2010 17:14, ning luwen wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 12:22 AM, NoOp<glgxg at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 08/03/2010 08:35 AM, ning luwen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> sudo apt-get update
>>>>> (...)
>>>>> sudo apt-get upgrade
>>>>> Reading package lists... Done
>>>>> Building dependency tree
>>>>> Reading state information... Done
>>>>> You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these.
>>>>> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>>>>> language-pack-en: Depends: language-pack-en-base (>=
>>>>> 1:10.10+20100703) but it is not installed
>>>>> E: Unmet dependencies. Try using -f.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Ah right. Sorry, I should have noticed. My apologies.
>>>>
>>>> 1:10.10 is for Maverick
>>>> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/language-pack-en-base
>>>> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/language-pack-en
>>>>
>>>> Looks like 1:10.10+20100703 was a Maverick proposed.
>>>> Available diffs
>>>> * diff from 1:10.10+20100724 to 1:10.10+20100727 (371.9 KiB)
>>>>
>>>> So I guess the question would be why you are getting Maverick
>>>> dependencies on lucid.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> i upgrade my ubuntu 10.04 from ubuntu 10.04
>>>
>>>
>> Sorry, but are you sure that you know what you are talking about?!
>>
> I am so sorry , that should be upgrade from 10.04 to 10.10
>
Aaah! Now we have it :-) .
But you do know that 10.10 (Maverick) is only at the *Alpha #2* stage
and is nowhere close to being a "release", don't you? :-)
Maverick is scheduled for release in this coming October - 2 months away
at least.
By using Alpha #2 you are taking your life into your own hands and
possibly about to fly off the precipice without a parachute :-D .
BC
--
If nothing happens, nothing can go wrong.
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list