Ubuntu 10.04 BETA1 (Lucid)

Mike McMullin mwmcmlln at mnsi.net
Wed Apr 7 06:49:07 UTC 2010


On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 18:09 +1000, Basil Chupin wrote:
> On 06/04/10 17:08, Fred A. Miller wrote:
> > On 04/06/2010 02:51 AM, Grizzly wrote:
> >    
> >> On 05 April 2010 at 21:29, Fred A. Miller
> >> Enlightened me with this:-Re: Ubuntu 10.04 BETA1 (Lucid)
> >>
> >>
> >>      
> >>> On 04/05/2010 02:55 PM, Grizzly wrote:
> >>>
> >>>        
> >>>> On 5 Apr 2010 at 23:34, Basil Chupin wrote: Ubuntu 10.04 BETA1 (Lucid) (at
> >>>> least in part)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>          
> >>>>> This is not meant to provoke a desktop or a distro war, so read it in
> >>>>> this light.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>            
> >>>> Can I "upgrade" to 10.4(beta) from 9.10 direct or do I need to start a fresh?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>          
> >>> You can upgrade.....I did one 2 days ago
> >>>
> >>>        
> >> I tried last night, expected time to install was 2:49 @ 23:00 it dropped to
> >> 2:30 by 23:48 (getting mew packages) so I went to bed and left it running :-<
> >>
> >> This morning @ 07:30 it was up to 3:26 (installing packages) so I gave up
> >>
> >> should it take that long to upgrade, I havnt got the fastest ADSL line but it
> >> does run @ 1.4mb
> >>
> >>      
> > 'Wouldn't think so. I haven't run Ubuntu for that long, but at no time
> > have I noted any of the servers being that slow.
> >
> > Fred
> >    
> 
> As far as I am concerned, they *ARE* slow :-( . I get thruout of around 
> 17Kbs/s or less. If I get up to 50+Kbs/s I am laughing.

  Can you switch to a non-Oz set of servers?





More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list