Slower performance with ext4
Chan Chung Hang Christopher
christopher.chan at bradbury.edu.hk
Fri Oct 30 10:30:36 UTC 2009
Raphael wrote:
> But isn't the default filesystem for ubuntu ext4, and isn't it the default for a reason?
>
/me rotfl. On RHEL/Centos, ext3 is the only filesystem available. Not
sure if they will offer ext3 + ext4 with RHEL6. Why?
ext4 is an unproven filesystem. Data loss anyone? Not like ext3 and jfs.
XFS codebase is so blooming big, I am not sure that it will ever reach
the state that ext3 and jfs currently are.
> Sent from my iPod
>
> On 30-Oct-2009, at 2:42 PM, Christopher Chan <christopher.chan at bradbury.edu.hk> wrote:
>
> Raphael wrote:
>
>
> Help, after I had clean installed Karmic on my ext4 partition, the
> performance was significantly slower compared to ext3. Startup was
> around 7 secs but with ext4 it's now 20 secs application speeds are
> also slower.
> jfs! jfs! jfs!
>
>
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list