Ubuntu SELinux status.

[Roger]

It's funny that you mention Debian because I was really thinking that
Debian should have been my choice for servers.

-r

On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 1:26 AM,  <christopher.lemire at gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree about no alternatives. Though I have it and seems obvious bugs to anyone, the devs have not fixed. However I think it works just fine under Debian. Ubuntu is too noob oriented for them to ship with SELinux like Fedora does. I'd been using Fedora since its early days when you had to be a hacker to get everything to work right.
> ------Original Message------
> From: Roger
> Sender: ubuntu-users-bounces at lists.ubuntu.com
> To: ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> ReplyTo: Ubuntu user technical support,not for general discussions
> Subject: Ubuntu SELinux status.
> Sent: Oct 22, 2009 11:56 AM
>
> Hello all,
>
> How well implemented is SELinux under Ubuntu when compared to Red Hat?
> An alternative to SELinux is not an option.
>
> Any input would be greatly appreciated. Thank you,
>
> Roger
>
> --
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
>
>
> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
>
> --
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
>