Whoever gave NM a keyring

[Leonard Chatagnier]

--- On Fri, 11/6/09, meandmine <redhowlingwolves at nc.rr.com> wrote:

> From: meandmine <redhowlingwolves at nc.rr.com>
> Subject: Re: Whoever gave NM a keyring
> To: ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> Date: Friday, November 6, 2009, 11:32 PM
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Markus Schönhaber wrote:
> > Karl F. Larsen:
> > 
> >> Markus Schönhaber wrote:
> >>> Karl F. Larsen:
> >>>
> >>>>     I hope it is possible
> to stop this stupidity.
> >>> That's what I hope, too.
> >>> But, alas, experience shows: you will not
> stop.
> >>>
> >>     I finish what I do much
> different from you. I direct you to 
> >> bug # 476967 which is technical and you may not
> understand it. 
> >> Too bad, for you!
> > 
> > OK, I've read your "bug report" (of which the most
> "technical" thing is
> > that you prove yourself, again, as technically
> clueless).
> > I was even inclined to consider that as funny. But,
> OTOH, you're wasting
> > the developers'/bug wranglers' time with senseless
> gibberish. And that
> > isn't funny at all.
> > 
> As I used to box when I was younger, I say take it to the
> ring or off list.
> Neither one has clearly spoken an answer to the origins of
> this post.
> Even though Karl started it. It's become a smattering of
> "I'm smarter
> than you, so shut up." to "I'm older and demand respect.".
> 
> After a simple Google, I found this: >
> http://lifehacker.com/276986/stop-nm+applet-from-authenticating-with-the-keyring
> and here is where that post is pointing: >
> http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?s=f5de5634f4448d733a599c23e4bb0257&p=2776815&postcount=1
> 
> Satisfied? Karl was actually right.
> 
> Me runs for flame-proof suit!
> Scott
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> 
> iQEVAwUBSvUGiqSvjvL7s/z0AQKtpgf/ZR4own9h8cSfYRdMnchWjOglw0MIp7I8
> p4PbLp40SGWVz+kEtB1kT2v2nU6ziTjr7eCsIjgE146vqGXYWWE+ez6OoL9yXULG
> 7tHx5RHWZpN0iqQY0Fcvl4BAfHb7+0MZ/oRMMKqYCZ0Dc5I0TqGCTLcjgY1ucdAO
> rGe0xIaaLkWTO8C1RybVhcXF4kpIX3weTFHc3nxDbO288PODuXkYbV3AITK43/x7
> jqySzaVYHrTJCnfoZNhvfYmdS+sgmN0p7bo0IvzH1SQ/9D0zVI4KU4rnIX7C2U0v
> OBvmdX8xOffTCc3OI8cr4RHkzghpkQMMAkddGUAqBOnT+VdOMt3eGg==
> =Cxiw
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
Yeah, you'll likely need it-:o))  Do you reckon that this
will now close the issue.  I hope so but rather doubt it will stop.  Good googling by the way.
Leonard Chatagnier
lenc5570 at sbcglobal.net