Slower performance with ext4

[Rashkae]

Ong Raphael wrote:
> 
> So, is the conclusion that ext4 sucks and ext3 rocks in performance wise?
> 

Err no, EXT4 is the clear performance winner.  But not everyone would be
comfortable using it in production environment due to how new it is, and
the potential for there still being nasty bugs in the code.  (which
likely there are, whether lots of people are affected by them or not.)