1280 X 768 corrected

[Derek Broughton]

Robert Holtzman wrote:

> On Tue, 26 May 2009, Derek Broughton wrote:
> 
>> Dennis wrote:
>>
>>> 1st post 'subject' was in error, sorry folks.
>>
>> Great, but you didn't answer my question.  1280 x 768 isn't a proper
>> resolution, so what _should_ it be?
>>
> 
> Excuse me but I came late to this thread. Could you elaborate on why
> 1280 x 768 isn't a proper resolution? That's what I'm running with my
> nVidia GeForce 8400 GS card.

Well, I guess it _is_ right - since he can get that on his internal display 
- but it's 32 pixels short of a genuine 16:10 resolution, which is what 
widescreen monitors advertize.
-- 
derek