Ubuntu 8.04 LTS boot problems - File system is NOT clean
Erasmus, P, Mnr <perasmus@sun.ac.za>
perasmus at sun.ac.za
Fri Jul 31 11:09:08 UTC 2009
Hi All,
Thanks for the great work you are doing, I really enjoy this list and have learned a lot from it.
I am running VMware ESx 3i on a dell PE2850 server, I have about 5 Linux vms running on this. I had a system crash yesterday morning and had some problems getting it up and running again, it freezed on boot. This is my main email server and also nfs server. After booting from cd and running fsck the server booted up fine. But I would like to schedule reboot over the weekend to see if it boots fine. Can you please assist me with this error, I am not sure yet what exactly happened.
Here is the output from my log: (any help would be great)
Reiserfs super block in block 16 on 0x807 of format 3.6 with standard journal
Blocks (total/free): 3289296/2906825 by 4096 bytes
File system is NOT clean
Reiserfs super block in block 16 on 0x811 of format 3.6 with standard journal
Blocks (total/free): 39321072/19976457 by 4096 bytes
File system is NOT clean
Reiserfs super block in block 16 on 0x807 of format 3.6 with standard journal
Blocks (total/free): 3289296/2906825 by 4096 bytes
File system is NOT clean
Paul
Send ubuntu-users mailing list submissions to
ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ubuntu-users-request at lists.ubuntu.com
You can reach the person managing the list at
ubuntu-users-owner at lists.ubuntu.com
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of ubuntu-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: WICD (Shannon McMackin)
2. Re: procmail filter for mailinglist (Derek Broughton)
3. Re: Dual-boot setup still not working... (Derek Broughton)
4. Re: Customise or Remaster ubuntu 9.04 jaunty from an image
file (NoOp)
5. Re: File system locked on upgrade (Derek Broughton)
6. Re: WICD (NoOp)
7. Re: drivers/net/usb/asix - Re: WS-UL220G USB 2.0 Gigabit
Ethernet Adapter in Dell Inspiron 700m laptop (Zenaan Harkness)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:18:23 -0400
From: Shannon McMackin <smcmackin at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: WICD
To: ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
Message-ID: <h3on1f$1fh$1 at ger.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 07/16/2009 07:23 PM, Karl F. Larsen wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Fred Roller wrote:
>> On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 16:51 -0600, Karl F. Larsen wrote:
>>> Not on my Jaunty. It fumbles around and says it can't find it.
>>> How do I
>>> add the universe repository? maybe man apt-get?
>> gksu gedit /etc/apt/source.list
>>
>> uncomment the two lines that look like:
>>
>> # deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ jaunty universe
>> # deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ jaunty universe
>>
>> so they look like
>>
>> deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ jaunty universe
>> deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ jaunty universe
>>
>> and save.
>>
>> then run:
>>
>> sudo apt-get update
>>
>> when complete run
>>
>> sudo apt-get install wicd
>>
>
> Thank you, Thank you, that got it. I wonder why wicd is so difficult to
> get? It should be a normal thing on new Ubuntu versions.
>
>
> 73 Karl
>
>
> - --
>
> Karl F. Larsen, AKA K5DI
> Linux User
> #450462 http://counter.li.org.
> Key ID = 3951B48D
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFKX7ZcNuSIOjlRtI0RApg0AJ9qdTUnSD7adxHGnQgt8kuEECZleQCfazOd
> XSH0cupzVglAWkOYguPbuew=
> =dSdS
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
It's not that it isn't normal, it's not the standard. Everything that
isn't standard in Ubuntu or things that are maintained by the community
are in the universe repo.
If it were an option to install WICD, then it would be in the std repo.
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 23:06:22 -0300
From: Derek Broughton <derek at pointerstop.ca>
Subject: Re: procmail filter for mailinglist
To: ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
Message-ID: <ut25j6-rqm.ln1 at morgen.pointerstop.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Siggy Brentrup wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 23:26 -0300, Derek Broughton wrote:
>> Siggy Brentrup wrote:
>
>> > Never put this in your .procmailrc: by crafting a Sender:
>> > xxxx-bounces at some.where in a malicious message anybody can create
>> > a maildir on your system, from now on any mail carrying this header
>> > will be delivered to list.xxxx/ without you even noticing :)
>>
>> WTP? I fail to see how that's an issue. I don't use procmail, but I
>> _do_
>> filter mail into essentially random maildirs. If it's spam, or any
>> other malicious content, it's just sitting there in a folder - it's
>> _never_
>> unnoticed. It will show up as New mail.
>
> Not with my MUA, it only checks mailboxes declared in .muttrc. Citing
> it's author: "All mail clients suck. This one just sucks less." -me,
> circa 1995
Well, many other clients have learned to suck less in the following 14
years, and even mutt does IMAP these days - which is why it doesn't matter
whether mail gets directed to a brand new folder, the IMAP server still
shows it.
>> > Most if not all MTAs handle .forward.
>>
>> Absolutely, but not fetchmail itself.
>
> It's no MTA, no MDA, it's a mess <duck/>.
No, I agree with you - but the OP was complaining that fetchmail ignored his
.forward - and I was just trying to explain why (and yes, I use fetchmail
too).
--
derek
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 23:03:05 -0300
From: Derek Broughton <derek at pointerstop.ca>
Subject: Re: Dual-boot setup still not working...
To: ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
Message-ID: <pn25j6-rqm.ln1 at morgen.pointerstop.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Victor Padro wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 4:30 PM, J Bickhard<jbickhard at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Karl F. Larsen<klarsen1 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>> # grub-install --root-directory=/mnt /dev/sda
>>>
>>> This I think is wrong. I need to look at man grub but I do not think
>>> you can use grub-install unless your actually on the root directory. In
>>> anycase I will try it and see what happens.
Karl, you're an idiot. Of course you're wrong, again.
>> What does Man do?
>
> man shows you the manual for certain package:
> man apt
> man apache2
> man sudo
> etc
>
> in this case:
> man grub
In this case, "man grub-install"
--
derek
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:21:11 -0700
From: NoOp <glgxg at sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: Customise or Remaster ubuntu 9.04 jaunty from an image
file
To: ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
Message-ID: <h3on6o$1v7$1 at ger.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On 07/16/2009 12:25 PM, DIPIN KRISHNA wrote:
> Customise or Remaster ubuntu 9.04 jaunty from an image
> file<http://blog.dipinkrishna.info/2009/07/customise-or-remaster-ubuntu-904-jaunty.html>
>
>
See
> Customise or Remaster ubuntu 9.04 jaunty from an image
> file<http://blog.dipinkrishna.info/2009/07/customise-or-remaster-ubuntu-904-jaunty.html>
>
>
Dipin Krishna
>
>
Thanks & well done.
@David Curtis: you might want to check out Dipin's other linux tips:
http://blog.dipinkrishna.info/
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 23:09:42 -0300
From: Derek Broughton <derek at pointerstop.ca>
Subject: Re: File system locked on upgrade
To: ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
Message-ID: <6435j6-rqm.ln1 at morgen.pointerstop.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
David S Angulo wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Derek Broughton<derek at pointerstop.ca>
> wrote:
>> Why are you still using ext2? It really isn't smart, and it's so easy to
>> add a journal and turn it into ext3 (see tune2fs). Then if you manage to
>> turn off the machine without properly shutting down, it'll be able to
>> recover properly.
>> --
>> derek
>>
>
> I read the man page for tune2fs. I don't see what this or fsck have
> to do with my failed upgrade, and I don't know what you're suggesting
> I do with tune2fs. I see to add a journal I should do
>
> tune2fs -j
>
> Is that it? WIll that make it ext3? Will I need to change
> /etc/fstab?
Yes, yes, and yes.
> Will I need to change anything else?
No.
> How will that help my read-only status?
It won't do a thing to help _this_ time, but it will make it far less likely
to happen again in the future.
--
derek
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:29:47 -0700
From: NoOp <glgxg at sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: WICD
To: ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
Message-ID: <h3onms$2nu$1 at ger.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On 07/16/2009 05:50 PM, Karl F. Larsen wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> NoOp wrote:
>> On 07/16/2009 04:35 PM, Jay Daniels wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 18:44 -0400, Fred Roller wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 16:10 -0600, Karl F. Larsen wrote:
>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>>
>>>>> I recall you must have the right repository installed before you can
>>>>> get wicd. I just put Jaunty on my old Sony laptop for some testing but I
>>>>> just HATE Network Manager!
>>>>>
>>>>> Does anyone recall how to get wicd?
>>>>>
>>>>> 73 Karl
>>>>>
>>>>> - --
>>>> Installing Wicd in Ubuntu
>>>> If you are using Ubuntu 9.04 (Jaunty), Wicd 1.5.9 is in the universe
>>>> repository, so a simple sudo apt-get install wicd will do it. If you
>>>> want the latest version of Wicd when it comes out, though, you'll need
>>>> to add the Wicd repository. Jaunty users who need to download the Wicd
>>>> deb package can grab it from Ubuntu's Universe repository.
>>>>
>>>> from: http://wicd.sourceforge.net/download.php
>>>>
>>> It never states where the wicd repository is located nor how to connect
>>> with Hardy or how to add the repository key?
>>>
>>> Very confusing statements on that page. hey, want the latest version?
>>> Get it from hidden repository which we are not going to tell you about.
>>>
>>
>> You need the secret handshake...
>> http://apt.wicd.net/dists/
>> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wicd/+publishinghistory
>>
>> BTW: for Karl - you might want to take your remember pills :-)
>> http://wicd.sourceforge.net/moinmoin
>> <http://wicd.sourceforge.net/moinmoin/Wicd_on_Ubuntu>
>> Wicd on Ubuntu (last edited 2009-05-26 12:54:58 by KarlLarsen)
>>
>>
>>
>>
> You might just try to fix it. I do not even pretend to know how to do
> many things, but by god I know wicd is so much better than the other it
> is worth getting.
>
What on earth are you on today? Your initial post:
> I recall you must have the right repository installed before you can
> get wicd. I just put Jaunty on my old Sony laptop for some testing but I
> just HATE Network Manager!
>
> Does anyone recall how to get wicd?
You made a big fuss about wicd a few months ago and wrote the friggin
wiki page that I pointed you to.
And as an aside, either fix your newfound GnuPG signature so that it is
actually a sig, or eliminate it. 15 lines of added noise is as bad as
those that post their company confidentiality nonsense to the list.
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:32:54 +1000
From: Zenaan Harkness <zen at freedbms.net>
Subject: Re: drivers/net/usb/asix - Re: WS-UL220G USB 2.0 Gigabit
Ethernet Adapter in Dell Inspiron 700m laptop
To: linux-net at vger.kernel.org, ubuntu-users
<ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com>
Cc: dhollis at davehollis.com, dbrownell at users.sourceforge.net
Message-ID: <20090717023254.GA12636 at freedbms.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Bump.
Please let me know if there is anything else I can do to narrow down why
this device is not working for me.
Thanks
Zenaan
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 04:01:23AM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> I have a number of WS-UL220G USB 2.0 Ethernet adapters, new. I have
> tested with two of them, see below.
>
> Testing in Dell Inspiron 700m laptop, a few years old, with two USB 2.0
> ports - tested in both ports.
>
> Kernel module is "asix" it appears.
>
> I'm running Ubuntu 8.04. I've tested (tonight) this device on the
> following kernels:
> vmlinuz-2.6.24-19-generic
> vmlinuz-2.6.24-23-generic
> vmlinuz-2.6.24-24-generic
>
> The manufacturer advertises Linux support.
>
> Related URLS, chipset/ controller device manufacturer page:
> http://www.asix.com.tw/products.php?op=pItemdetail&PItemID=84;71;100&PLine=71
>
> I thought I made one of these devices work about a month or two ago,
> when they first arrived, with simple/ standard config/ setup, as with
> any other network device. Now I have failed to make either the original
> device I tested with, or another one fresh out of its packet, to work.
>
>
> Here's my session, after a fresh reboot:
>
> # connect cat5 to internal device:
>
> $ cat /etc/network/interfaces
> auto lo
> iface lo inet loopback
>
> iface eth2 inet static
> address 172.22.22.62
> netmask 255.255.255.0
> metric 29
>
> iface eth0 inet static
> address 172.22.22.61
> netmask 255.255.255.0
> gateway 172.22.22.2
> metric 0
>
> $ ifconfig
> lo Link encap:Local Loopback
> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
> inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
> UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
> RX packets:1498 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:1498 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> RX bytes:77578 (75.7 KB) TX bytes:77578 (75.7 KB)
>
> $ route -n
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
>
> # modprobe asix
>
> # lsmod|grep asix
> asix 18304 0
> usbnet 20232 1 asix
> mii 6400 3 asix,usbnet,b44
> usbcore 146412 7
> asix,usbnet,hsfusbcd2,hsfosspec,ehci_hcd,uhci_hcd
>
> # ifup eth0
>
> # ifconfig
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0f:1f:b2:c3:44
> inet addr:172.22.22.61 Bcast:172.22.22.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> inet6 addr: fe80::20f:1fff:feb2:c344/64 Scope:Link
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:3 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:23 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
> RX bytes:252 (252.0 B) TX bytes:2631 (2.5 KB)
> Interrupt:10
>
> lo Link encap:Local Loopback
> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
> inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
> UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
> RX packets:1473 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:1473 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> RX bytes:73688 (71.9 KB) TX bytes:73688 (71.9 KB)
>
> # route -n
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
> 172.22.22.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
> 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
> 0.0.0.0 172.22.22.2 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
>
>
> # syslog entries for above activities:
> Jul 11 03:04:18 ip61zen kernel: [ 342.207112] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
> Jul 11 03:04:18 ip61zen avahi-daemon[5068]: Joining mDNS multicast group on interface eth0.IPv4 with address 172.22.22.61.
> Jul 11 03:04:18 ip61zen avahi-daemon[5068]: New relevant interface eth0.IPv4 for mDNS.
> Jul 11 03:04:18 ip61zen avahi-daemon[5068]: Registering new address record for 172.22.22.61 on eth0.IPv4.
> Jul 11 03:04:18 ip61zen avahi-daemon[5068]: Withdrawing address record for 172.22.22.61 on eth0.
> Jul 11 03:04:18 ip61zen avahi-daemon[5068]: Leaving mDNS multicast group on interface eth0.IPv4 with address 172.22.22.61.
> Jul 11 03:04:18 ip61zen avahi-daemon[5068]: Interface eth0.IPv4 no longer relevant for mDNS.
> Jul 11 03:04:18 ip61zen avahi-daemon[5068]: Joining mDNS multicast group on interface eth0.IPv4 with address 172.22.22.61.
> Jul 11 03:04:18 ip61zen avahi-daemon[5068]: New relevant interface eth0.IPv4 for mDNS.
> Jul 11 03:04:18 ip61zen avahi-daemon[5068]: Registering new address record for 172.22.22.61 on eth0.IPv4.
> Jul 11 03:04:18 ip61zen postfix/master[5826]: reload configuration /etc/postfix
> Jul 11 03:04:22 ip61zen kernel: [ 343.368131] b44: eth0: Link is up at 10 Mbps, half duplex.
> Jul 11 03:04:22 ip61zen kernel: [ 343.368142] b44: eth0: Flow control is off for TX and off for RX.
> Jul 11 03:04:22 ip61zen kernel: [ 343.373190] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready
> Jul 11 03:04:24 ip61zen avahi-daemon[5068]: Registering new address record for fe80::20f:1fff:feb2:c344 on eth0.*.
> Jul 11 03:04:28 ip61zen ntpdate[8520]: no server suitable for synchronization found
> Jul 11 03:04:33 ip61zen kernel: [ 344.815162] eth0: no IPv6 routers present
>
>
> # ping 172.22.22.2
> PING 172.22.22.2 (172.22.22.2) 56(84) bytes of data.
> 64 bytes from 172.22.22.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.480 ms
> 64 bytes from 172.22.22.2: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.460 ms
> 64 bytes from 172.22.22.2: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.454 ms
>
> --- 172.22.22.2 ping statistics ---
> 3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2000ms
> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.454/0.464/0.480/0.027 ms
>
>
> All is clearly well with internal eth device. Now for external "asix" device:
>
> # ifdown eth0
>
> # syslog:
> Jul 11 03:08:38 ip61zen postfix/master[5826]: reload configuration /etc/postfix
> Jul 11 03:08:38 ip61zen avahi-daemon[5068]: Interface eth0.IPv4 no longer relevant for mDNS.
> Jul 11 03:08:38 ip61zen avahi-daemon[5068]: Leaving mDNS multicast group on interface eth0.IPv4 with address 172.22.22.61.
> Jul 11 03:08:38 ip61zen avahi-daemon[5068]: Withdrawing address record for fe80::20f:1fff:feb2:c344 on eth0.
> Jul 11 03:08:38 ip61zen avahi-daemon[5068]: Withdrawing address record for 172.22.22.61 on eth0.
>
> # ifconfig
> lo Link encap:Local Loopback
> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
> inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
> UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
> RX packets:1473 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:1473 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> RX bytes:73688 (71.9 KB) TX bytes:73688 (71.9 KB)
>
> # route -n
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
>
> # disconnect cat5 from internal dev
>
> # connect asix/ usb 2 gige dev:
>
> # ifconfig
> eth2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0e:c6:87:9b:3c
> UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
> RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)
>
> lo Link encap:Local Loopback
> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
> inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
> UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
> RX packets:1473 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:1473 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> RX bytes:73688 (71.9 KB) TX bytes:73688 (71.9 KB)
>
> # syslog:
> Jul 11 03:10:35 ip61zen kernel: [ 395.460971] usb 4-1: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 2
> Jul 11 03:10:35 ip61zen kernel: [ 395.606195] usb 4-1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
> Jul 11 03:10:35 ip61zen NetworkManager: <debug> [1247245835.564443] nm_hal_device_added(): New device added (hal udi is '/org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/usb_device_b95_1780_009988').
> Jul 11 03:10:35 ip61zen NetworkManager: <debug> [1247245835.692066] nm_hal_device_added(): New device added (hal udi is '/org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/usb_device_b95_1780_009988_if0').
> Jul 11 03:10:36 ip61zen kernel: [ 396.732266] eth2: register 'asix' at usb-0000:00:1d.7-1, ASIX AX88178 USB 2.0 Ethernet, 00:0e:c6:87:9b:3c
> Jul 11 03:10:36 ip61zen NetworkManager: <debug> [1247245836.389099] nm_hal_device_added(): New device added (hal udi is '/org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/net_00_0e_c6_87_9b_3c').
> Jul 11 03:10:36 ip61zen kernel: [ 148.796558] eth2: link down
> Jul 11 03:10:36 ip61zen kernel: [ 148.801263] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth2: link is not ready
>
>
> # ifup eth2
>
> # ifconfig
> eth2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0e:c6:87:9b:3c
> inet addr:172.22.22.62 Bcast:172.22.22.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
> RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)
>
> lo Link encap:Local Loopback
> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
> inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
> UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
> RX packets:1475 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:1475 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> RX bytes:73864 (72.1 KB) TX bytes:73864 (72.1 KB)
>
> # route -n
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
> 172.22.22.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 29 0 0 eth2
> 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 29 0 0 eth2
>
> # syslog:
> Jul 11 03:11:44 ip61zen avahi-daemon[5068]: Joining mDNS multicast group on interface eth2.IPv4 with address 172.22.22.62.
> Jul 11 03:11:44 ip61zen avahi-daemon[5068]: New relevant interface eth2.IPv4 for mDNS.
> Jul 11 03:11:44 ip61zen avahi-daemon[5068]: Registering new address record for 172.22.22.62 on eth2.IPv4.
> Jul 11 03:11:44 ip61zen avahi-daemon[5068]: Withdrawing address record for 172.22.22.62 on eth2.
> Jul 11 03:11:44 ip61zen avahi-daemon[5068]: Leaving mDNS multicast group on interface eth2.IPv4 with address 172.22.22.62.
> Jul 11 03:11:44 ip61zen avahi-daemon[5068]: Interface eth2.IPv4 no longer relevant for mDNS.
> Jul 11 03:11:44 ip61zen avahi-daemon[5068]: Joining mDNS multicast group on interface eth2.IPv4 with address 172.22.22.62.
> Jul 11 03:11:44 ip61zen avahi-daemon[5068]: New relevant interface eth2.IPv4 for mDNS.
> Jul 11 03:11:44 ip61zen avahi-daemon[5068]: Registering new address record for 172.22.22.62 on eth2.IPv4.
> Jul 11 03:11:44 ip61zen postfix/master[5826]: reload configuration /etc/postfix
> Jul 11 03:12:04 ip61zen ntpdate[9283]: can't find host ntp.ubuntu.com
> Jul 11 03:12:04 ip61zen ntpdate[9283]: no servers can be used, exiting
>
>
> # connect cat5 to asix device:
>
> # syslog:
> Jul 11 03:13:10 ip61zen kernel: [ 562.760197] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth2: link becomes ready
> Jul 11 03:13:10 ip61zen kernel: [ 562.763641] eth2: link up, 10Mbps, half-duplex, lpa 0x0021
> Jul 11 03:13:12 ip61zen avahi-daemon[5068]: Registering new address record for fe80::20e:c6ff:fe87:9b3c on eth2.*.
> Jul 11 03:13:21 ip61zen kernel: [ 574.288501] eth2: no IPv6 routers present
>
> # ping 172.22.22.2
> PING 172.22.22.2 (172.22.22.2) 56(84) bytes of data.
> From 172.22.22.62 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable
> From 172.22.22.62 icmp_seq=3 Destination Host Unreachable
> From 172.22.22.62 icmp_seq=4 Destination Host Unreachable
>
> --- 172.22.22.2 ping statistics ---
> 4 packets transmitted, 0 received, +3 errors, 100% packet loss, time 2999ms
> , pipe 3
>
> # route add default gw 172.22.22.2
>
> # route -n
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
> 172.22.22.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 29 0 0 eth2
> 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 29 0 0 eth2
> 0.0.0.0 172.22.22.2 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth2
>
> # ping 172.22.22.2
> PING 172.22.22.2 (172.22.22.2) 56(84) bytes of data.
> From 172.22.22.62 icmp_seq=1 Destination Host Unreachable
> From 172.22.22.62 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable
> From 172.22.22.62 icmp_seq=3 Destination Host Unreachable
>
> --- 172.22.22.2 ping statistics ---
> 4 packets transmitted, 0 received, +3 errors, 100% packet loss, time 3004ms
> , pipe 4
>
>
> BTW, the cat5 cable is connected in all cases to a hub (10MBit 4/5 port
> DLink), it is a straight-through, not a cross-over cable. I've tried two
> different cat5 patch leads with the above procedure. I've tried also the
> hubs "uplink" (crossover) port.
>
> I've tried two brand new asix devices:
> USB2.0 GIGABIT LAN DELPHI G
> Gigabit USB 2.0 Ethernet Adapter
> WS-UL220G
>
> Any testing avenues appreciated.
>
> TIA
> Zenaan
>
> --
> Homepage: www.SoulSound.net -- Free Australia: www.UPMART.org
> Please respect the confidentiality of this email as sensibly warranted.
>
> --
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
--
Homepage: www.SoulSound.net -- Free Australia: www.UPMART.org
Please respect the confidentiality of this email as sensibly warranted.
------------------------------
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
End of ubuntu-users Digest, Vol 59, Issue 188
*********************************************
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list