pine

NoOp glgxg at sbcglobal.net
Sun Jul 26 03:20:36 UTC 2009


On 07/25/2009 07:08 PM, Karl F. Larsen wrote:
...
> Res wrote:
...
>> Karls setup would be correct for how its done, some pgp, insert (yes 
>> wrongfully) a separate dash before any sig delims, screwing it all up, its 
>> one of the reasons i stopped using it myself a while back, it was annoying 
>> to me so I know it most have peeved others.
>> 
> 
> 	Steve I will write the guy I send email to in the National HQ of Bank
> of America. If he has a problem he has never told me. We started this
> when Obama was elected. But I will ask him because I am an owner and he
> might not tell me.

That's the HQ in Nigeria right :-)

Anyway, this thread looks to be already 3 years old:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/2006-April/073331.html
Note the references to Pine and, of course gpg signatures.

And of course don't miss the 'Next message: OT: USENET and cryptography
(was: "annoying" inline gpg signatures)' posts.

In any event, I think that you can safely turn off your GnuPG sig for
this list; afterall do you expect others on the list to send you an
encrypted response? As I mentioned previously; the signature is as
irritating as those that send the 'confidentiality' notices from a
company account.





More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list