pine

[Siggy Brentrup]

On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 15:37 -0600, Karl F. Larsen wrote:
> Siggy Brentrup wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 15:11 -0600, Karl F. Larsen wrote:
> >>> BTW, out of curiosity, why do you use an inline sig and not a detached 
> >>> one?
> >>>
> >> 	I do not know the difference between inline sig and a detatched one.
> > 
> > That's just the difference between your style of gpg signing (inline)
> > and mine (detached).

> 	I still do not understand what you are saying. I sign my emails with
> pgp the way they told me to do it. It is 100% automatic. So if you would
> prefer me to use your method tell me how you do it. Or, direct me to
> reading.

I'll reply off list with an URL of a screen shot showing why we don't
like your inline signatures,  it's extra work to remove that cruft
when citing.
Off list because I don't want that URL to be spread.

cu
  Siggy
-- 
Please don't Cc: me when replying, I might not see either copy.
               bsb-at-psycho-dot-informationsanarchistik-dot-de
               or:                bsb-at-psycho-dot-i21k-dot-de
O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20090725/50d220e2/attachment.sig>