No good CD-Rom copy software (fwd)

[Res]

not my problem your mailer reads it as different,m  it is a forward of an 
email and pine clearly does not assicate it to how you want it, tuff 
luck for you.

On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, NoOp wrote:

> Top posted on purpose.
>
> Two questions:
>
> 1. Why is it that you can't seem to figure out how to post in the
> original thread and instead continue to spawn these new posts?
>
> 2. 'Joerg'/Jörg Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de>
> posted on this list previously
>
> Message-ID: <4a48993a.5OvWfFQn9ND8gJni%Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de>
> Subject: Re: No good CD-Rom copy software
> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:36:42 +0200
>
> so apparently he's subscribed to the list. Any reason why you need to do
> a 'man-in-the-middle' here?

after it was 'approved' by a moderator, unless he's subscribbed in the 
last 12 hours, Jorg told me last week he is not on this list.



> Recommend that you go back to the original thread and comment there.

recommend you learn how to use a real mail client



>
> On 07/06/2009 03:49 PM, Res wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks Jorg, this only confirms mine and others suspicions..
>> 
>> Oli, and others: forwarded to the list so you dont have to wait a week for 
>> the mod to approve the post.
>> 
>> So, Oli, what has Ubuntu got to say about this....., also please CC Jorg
>> directly in Emails reference this issue (as he is not a member of this list).
>> 
>> Res
>> 
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 23:25:46
>> From: Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de>
>> To: ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com, res at ausics.net
>> Subject: Re: No good CD-Rom copy software
>> 
>> Res <res at ausics.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> Well, then lets hear Jorgs point of view on this...
>>> I will gladly report his reply to the list if he says thats OK, given he
>>> is not a member so you wont have to wait a week for the mod to see and
>>> approve his post to the list.
>>>
>>> Jorg for your reference, the stated reason was linked to in an earler
>>> reply I've already deleted, but this is the archive that they pointed to:
>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-news-team/2009-February/000413.html
>> 
>> Just a note, this does not contain not an official statement from Eben
>> Moglen, there is only a POV claim from Mark Shuttleworth and this is
>> definitely wrong :-(
>> 
>> Eben Moglen did tell me in several private mails that there is no license problem
>> with cdrtools. Moglen send me even mail that explains why the claims about the
>> so-called GPL CDDL incompatibility as found on the FSF websites are wrong.
>> 
>> I am sure that Moglen will never make a public claim that could support the
>> statement from Mark Shuttleworth.
>> 
>> Note that The Sun legal department did make a full legal review on the cdrtools
>> project and did not find any license problem.
>> 
>> Note that the book from an independend lawyer (Lawrence Rosen - the lawyer of
>> the OpenSource Inittiative) wrote a book on OSS licenses that explains the GPL
>> in a word level granularity (see: http://www.rosenlaw.com/Rosen_Ch06.pdf) and
>> that explains why none of the claims made by the  non-cooperative Debian
>> package maintainer that initated the dispute is valid.
>> 
>> Jörg
>> 
>> 
>
>
>
> -- 
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users

-- 
Res

-Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers