[ubuntu-users] Confused over CIFS
matthew.flaschen at gatech.edu
Mon Jan 12 03:23:02 UTC 2009
Preston Kutzner wrote:
> On Jan 11, 2009, at 1:02 AM, Matthew Flaschen wrote:
>> It appears smbmount/mount.smbfs is actually just a thin wrapper around
>> mount.cifs. Can you give a reason to use one over the other?
> This, in particular. SMBFS is deprecated and unsupported by the Samba
The mount.smbfs in Ubuntu is just a wrapper over mount.cifs. They are
not separate implementations, just separate interfaces.
More information about the ubuntu-users