MiB in gparted?
Dave Woyciesjes
woyciesjes at sbcglobal.net
Tue Feb 10 18:31:45 UTC 2009
Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
> I am one of those who think it's important to separate MB from MiB (and
> GB from GiB etc etc), just for the simple reason that there is a big
> difference. It's not htat hard either: 1 MB = 10⁶ bytes = 1000000 bytes,
> 1 MiB = 2²⁰ bytes = 1048576 bytes.
Agreed.
> However, I can't really say that I can see clearly why MiB is necessary
> these days. Why not just skip it and only use MB, GB and so on, really
> meaning MB, GB and so on? All hard drives capacity are in MB, GB or TB
> anyway, not MiB, GiB or TiB.
>
> What's wrong with saying 65,6 kB instead of 64,0 KiB? My interna drive
> in this old laptop is 160 GB, so why would I say 149 GiB?
Because 10GB is a fair amount of storage space. Who wants to pay
for/plan on space that they're not getting?
> Just skip the binary prefixes and use the good old decimal ones. It's
> not that complicated for anyone with a brain.
No comment...
> And, as a parallel in the "real" world, I still don't understand why
> people say things like 325800 km rather than 325.8 Mm, which is the same
> thing but the latter is shorter and better.
Not exactly a parallel. MiB vs. MB has to do with the various ways bits
& bytes are counted; decimal & binary.
Meters are meters, always decimal.
--
--- Dave Woyciesjes
--- ICQ# 905818
--- AIM - woyciesjes
--- CompTIA A+ Certified IT Tech - http://certification.comptia.org/
--- HDI Certified Support Center Analyst - http://www.ThinkHDI.com/
"From there to here,
From here to there,
Funny things
are everywhere."
--- Dr. Seuss
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list