Pc not waking up after Kunbuntu add/remove
Adam Petty
linux at papettys.com
Sun Dec 20 12:28:27 UTC 2009
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 6:19 AM, Werner Schram <wrschram at gmail.com> wrote:
> Adam Petty wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Werner Schram <wrschram at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Adam Petty wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ok I was wrong about the numlock. It did not turn on/off and I tried
>>>> remoting and got nothing
>>>>
>>>> Here is what I was able to get from the Kern.log looks like it locked @ 14:23:13
>>>>
>>>> Dec 19 14:23:13 Kitchen-Linux kernel: [ 6482.020661] "echo 0 >
>>>> /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
>>>> Dec 19 14:23:13 Kitchen-Linux kernel: [ 6482.020665] i915/0 D
>>>> 0000000000000000 0 300 2 0x00000000
>>>>
>>>>
>>> The second message refers to i915, which is the name of a module for a
>>> intel video adapter, so that would be the one that crashed. The first
>>> message seems to refer to an earlier message about a hung task. Is there
>>> some more information about that in the log file? Is there something
>>> relevant in /var/log/messages around 14:23?
>>>
>>> Werner
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Its mostly the same error until 13:16 Then this
>>
>> Dec 19 13:16:55 Kitchen-Linux kernel: [ 2503.110480] Mem-Info:
>> Dec 19 13:16:55 Kitchen-Linux kernel: [ 2503.110483] Node 0 DMA per-cpu:
>> Dec 19 13:16:55 Kitchen-Linux kernel: [ 2503.110487] CPU 0: hi:
>> 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
>> Dec 19 13:16:55 Kitchen-Linux kernel: [ 2503.110490] CPU 1: hi:
>> 0, btch: 1 usd: 0
>> Dec 19 13:16:55 Kitchen-Linux kernel: [ 2503.110492] Node 0 DMA32 per-cpu:
>> Dec 19 13:16:55 Kitchen-Linux kernel: [ 2503.110496] CPU 0: hi:
>> 186, btch: 31 usd: 178
>> Dec 19 13:16:55 Kitchen-Linux kernel: [ 2503.110499] CPU 1: hi:
>> 186, btch: 31 usd: 78
>> Dec 19 13:16:55 Kitchen-Linux kernel: [ 2503.110504]
>> Active_anon:302882 active_file:180 inactive_anon:100904
>> Dec 19 13:16:55 Kitchen-Linux kernel: [ 2503.110506] inactive_file:93
>> unevictable:0 dirty:0 writeback:0 unstable:0
>> Dec 19 13:16:55 Kitchen-Linux kernel: [ 2503.110507] free:3436
>> slab:16808 mapped:3935 pagetables:6704 bounce:0
>> Dec 19 13:16:55 Kitchen-Linux kernel: [ 2503.110510] Node 0 DMA
>> free:8028kB min:40kB low:48kB high:60kB active_anon:5972kB
>> inactive_anon:1728kB active_file:12kB inactive_file:0kB
>> unevictable:0kB present:15316kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no
>> Dec 19 13:16:55 Kitchen-Linux kernel: [ 2503.110517] lowmem_reserve[]:
>> 0 1994 1994 1994
>> Dec 19 13:16:55 Kitchen-Linux kernel: [ 2503.110524] Node 0 DMA32
>> free:5716kB min:5692kB low:7112kB high:8536kB active_anon:1205556kB
>> inactive_anon:401888kB active_file:708kB inactive_file:372kB
>> unevictable:0kB present:2042536kB pages_scanned:260 all_unreclaimable?
>> no
>> Dec 19 13:16:55 Kitchen-Linux kernel: [ 2503.110531] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
>> Dec 19 13:16:55 Kitchen-Linux kernel: [ 2503.110537] Node 0 DMA: 9*4kB
>> 3*8kB 6*16kB 2*32kB 2*64kB 0*128kB 2*256kB 2*512kB 2*1024kB 2*2048kB
>> 0*4096kB = 8028kB
>> Dec 19 13:16:55 Kitchen-Linux kernel: [ 2503.110552] Node 0 DMA32:
>> 385*4kB 2*8kB 4*16kB 1*32kB 2*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB 1*512kB 1*1024kB
>> 1*2048kB 0*4096kB = 5748kB
>> Dec 19 13:16:55 Kitchen-Linux kernel: [ 2503.110567] 60501 total pagecache pages
>> Dec 19 13:16:55 Kitchen-Linux kernel: [ 2503.110570] 0 pages in swap cache
>> Dec 19 13:16:55 Kitchen-Linux kernel: [ 2503.110572] Swap cache stats:
>> add 0, delete 0, find 0/0
>> Dec 19 13:16:55 Kitchen-Linux kernel: [ 2503.110575] Free swap = 0kB
>> Dec 19 13:16:55 Kitchen-Linux kernel: [ 2503.110577] Total swap = 0kB
>> Dec 19 13:16:55 Kitchen-Linux kernel: [ 2503.118127] 521809 pages RAM
>> Dec 19 13:16:55 Kitchen-Linux kernel: [ 2503.118130] 9927 pages reserved
>> Dec 19 13:16:55 Kitchen-Linux kernel: [ 2503.118132] 29411 pages shared
>> Dec 19 13:16:55 Kitchen-Linux kernel: [ 2503.118134] 482210 pages non-shared
>>
>> Do I not have a swap file?
>>
> It looks like it. Does /etc/fstab have a line like this?
> UUID=1ed76686-5524-43d4-bf8b-17595ac39f7e none swap
> sw 0 0
> or
> /dev/hda2 none swap sw 0 0
>
> and what is the output of the commands:
>
> sudo fdisk -l
>
> and:
>
> sudo blkid
>
> I just googled for simmilar log messages. It looks like what you just
> posted is the end of a stack trace of a 'page allocation failure'
> message. Which is likely related to the absence of your swap, and could
> be the cause of your suspend problems.
>
> Werner
>
After seeing that, I created a swap file and it still locked up over night
Here is the latest from the message log last lines before reboot. I
rebooted @ 7:10 The same were in the kern.log
Dec 20 02:22:55 Kitchen-Linux kernel: [22498.290550] ath5k phy0:
unsupported jumbo
Dec 20 06:05:38 Kitchen-Linux kernel: [35861.130019] usb 2-5: reset
high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 4
Since I am new to linux, I would not mind reinstalling the OS to much.
I'd rather not, that sounds really windowsish. But if I did decide to
do that, to keep my settings is it truly just coping my home folder
off to another drive?
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list