32 or 64 bit?
Fred Roller
froller at tnclimited.com
Sat Dec 5 06:36:21 UTC 2009
Nik N wrote:
> I am about to install Ubuntu 9.10 on a laptop with a 64-bit AMD Turion.
>
> Can someone point me to a text that discusses the pros and cons of
> using a 64-bit (vs. 32-bit) Ubuntu on it?
> TIA, Nik N.
>
>
I have been running 64 bit since I bought my laptop, which has amd64x2
and 4Gb RAM. I do a lot of virtualization and heavy graphics work on
occasion. At 4 gigs you can get the alternate PAE install for the extra
gig in 32 bit. What I and my partner have found is that the benies come
from heavy loads. He runs some 16-20 routers with dynamips and only 64
bit can keep the load down to around 30-40% cpu utilization. For me,
the 64 helps me keep four desktops doing a million things at once going
with little to no latency.
i.e. typical load for me could be firefox with 12-15 tabs, filezilla,
inkscape working on 3-4 documents, gimp with 2-3 documents, mail keeping
up with 8 accounts and 3 google calendars, vbox with xp and ubuntu
server to bang on, terminal with 3-4 tabs half of which sshing to
servers, and either rhythmbox piping di.fm or playing Ice Age for my
daughter on the second monitor.
Like a highway in the city. You don't always need the lanes but come
rush hour would you rather have 32 lanes or 64? Good luck in deciding.
--
Fred
www.fwrgallery.com
"Life is like linux, simple. If you are fighting it you are doing something wrong."
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list