Getting X to init corectly W/O a monitor conected
Fred Roller
froller at tnclimited.com
Thu Aug 27 18:56:32 UTC 2009
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 14:38 -0400, Mark Haney wrote:
> Obligatory old school question. What is wrong with killing X and
> using
> the command line? I mean, do you run remote X sessions from SSH to
> manage the system instead of just learning the CLI?
>
> If it's in a rack connected to a KVM, how often will you actually
> access
> the box from the KVM compared to a good old SSH session?
>
> Granted, this doesn't fix your problem, but it just amazes me that X
> just /has/ to be running even for konsole or yakuake sessions.
>
> Sigh.
>
OP mentioned the reason...
<quote>
If it matters, this machine actually starts 2 different X servers, [the]
default on, and one on a [different] tty that is used as an
[environment] for a VirtulBox session, so whatever I do
should probably be global to all X sessions.
</quote>
Could still control the from the ssh relieving the need for one of the
X-sessions. But the Vbox would still need one.
--
Fred R.
www.fwrgallery.com
"Life is like Linux - simple; if you are fighting it, you are doing
something wrong."
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list