wi-fi security?
Brian
ad44 at cityscape.co.uk
Thu Aug 6 18:09:48 UTC 2009
On Thu 06 Aug 2009 at 11:38:02 -0400, jason wrote:
> WPA, on the other hand, only requires a few seconds of data collection
> to force, then grab the authentication handshake. Then it's just a
> matter of horsepower and how strong your passphrase is. Keep in mind,
> this is a brute force against the passphrase, _not_ AES.
>
> Summary, use WPA, but make sure you choose a strong passphrase. Or, if
> you're motivated, roll your own enterprise scheme with openradius, etc.
I hadn't realised how easy it could be to capture the handshake but, because it
is the strength of the passphrase that matters, it seems to be only a minor
downside to WPA. You also imply there is no particular advantage in TKIP vs AES
or WPA vs WPA2 in this regard.
Some day I may try to crack the 63 character passphrase on my own WAP for fun,
but suspect I may not be around when it completes successfully.
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list