64-bit vs 32, speed difference
Alan Chandler
alan at chandlerfamily.org.uk
Mon Apr 13 07:09:17 UTC 2009
On Sunday 12 April 2009, Justin wrote:
> The address space (4GB) issue can be worked around with the bigmem
> kernel (I think the server kernel in Ubuntu). Speed wise, you'll see
> a difference in some apps and none in others. Multimedia, especially
> video, is one area where 64bit gets a small boost. Still, you're not
> likely to ever see anything close to even a 10% difference with
> 64bit, so it just depends how much the convenience means to you.
WHen I first got my Core2 duo, I switched over to 64bit, but after a
short while I had to switch back to 32bit. The main reason was the
flakeyness of using Flash. Because flash is a 32bit binary with no
source, all sorts of tricks are needed to get it to run with a 64 bit
user space - and these would seem to break quite frequently. For that
reason alone I went back to 32 bit. I haven't really noticed any
slowdown.
I think if I had a server, I would use 64 bit - but not on the desktop.
--
Alan Chandler
http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list