Blocked UDP Ports

[William Biggs]

are you and a router ?
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dean C. Cole" <dean at w5jx.com>
To: <ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 2:46 PM
Subject: Re: Blocked UDP Ports


> *Gentlemen, I installed svxlink.  It will not get through the UDP
> ports.  I give up.  I've been 4 days trying to release those ports.  I
> will reinstall XP and return Echolink back to my repeater.  I was really
> excited about migrating to Linux, but some things are not to be.  Thanks
> for all the help.  You tried.
>
> Dean
> *
> ubuntu-users-request at lists.ubuntu.com wrote:
>> Send ubuntu-users mailing list submissions to
>> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> ubuntu-users-request at lists.ubuntu.com
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> ubuntu-users-owner at lists.ubuntu.com
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of ubuntu-users digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>>    1. Re: ubuntu and music (Derek Broughton)
>>    2. No feedback from aticonfig (Job Evers)
>>    3. Re: PHTML (Ulin the Tech Mage)
>>    4. Re: PHTML (Markus Sch?nhaber)
>>    5. problem installing ubuntu 8.10 beta 5 and 8.04 in laptop
>>       compaq presario (camilo isaza)
>>    6. Re: PHTML (Rashkae)
>>    7. Re: Session Startup (Catalin David)
>>    8. Re: PHTML (Carl Friis-Hansen)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 12:26:07 -0300
>> From: Derek Broughton <news at pointerstop.ca>
>> Subject: Re: ubuntu and music
>> To: ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
>> Message-ID: <11871061.E2B5dLlRJs at cedar.serverforest.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>>
>> (``-_-??) -- Fernando wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Ol? Neil e a todos.
>>>
>>> On Tuesday 16 September 2008 14:03:47 Neil wrote:
>>>
>>>> Usually it takes a while before the last version of Wine has reached
>>>> the Ubuntu repositories. You might want to add the Wine repositories @
>>>> http://www.winehq.org/site/download-deb to stay up to date if it is
>>>> this important to you.
>>>>
>>> This is FUD. Really stop it, if you dont know what you are talking 
>>> about.
>>>
>>
>> _This_ is insulting.  Neil's absolutely right.
>>
>>
>>> Scott Ritchie has been making a WONDERFUL job by packing any version (or
>>> patch) of wine to most of Ubuntu versions, as soon as they came out, and
>>> making them FULLY compatible with Ubuntu system policies. Wine repo cant
>>> do that. So please just use the Ubuntu version, that you are going to 
>>> get
>>> very well served.
>>>
>>>
>>> FYI the latest version available is 1.0.0-1ubuntu10.
>>>
>>
>> Not to make light of Scott's work, but that's not even CLOSE to being
>> up-to-date.  The current version of Wine is 1.1.4.  This is what Neil was
>> talking about.  In fact, if you follow the instructions on WineHQ, you 
>> GET
>> Scott Ritchie's build of Wine 1.1.4 packaged for Hardy, so apparently 
>> it's
>> you who don't know what you're talking about.
>>
>> Now note, Wine does not consider this a stable build - it is, as Neil
>> suggested, only for those who want to be on the cutting edge.
>>
>
> -- 
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users