ubuntu and music

Brian McKee brian.mckee at gmail.com
Thu Sep 18 13:22:08 UTC 2008


On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 6:19 PM, (``-_-´´) -- Fernando
<ubuntu at bugabundo.net> wrote:
> Olá Neil e a todos.
>
> On Tuesday 16 September 2008 14:03:47 Neil wrote:
>> Usually it takes a while before the last version of Wine has reached
>> the Ubuntu repositories. You might want to add the Wine repositories @
>> http://www.winehq.org/site/download-deb to stay up to date if it is
>> this important to you.
>
> This is FUD. Really stop it, if you dont know what you are talking about.
>
> Scott Ritchie has been making a WONDERFUL job by packing any version (or patch) of wine to most of Ubuntu versions, as soon as they came out, and making them FULLY compatible with Ubuntu system policies.
> Wine repo cant do that.
> So please just use the Ubuntu version, that you are going to get very well served.

Can you point to some information that more clearly defines the
differences between the official versions and the winehq-budget
versions?   Not trolling!

Shortly after Hardy came out I had a few programs that worked with the
winehq versions that didn't with the official versions. I don't know
why - it's quite likely I could have made the official versions work,
but I have an aversion to twiddling with wine, since it's a Sisyphean
task. I 'pinned' the packages and haven't upgraded since, because I
know regressions in wine are the norm not the exception.  Since then
I've seen updates to both, and wondered how it all relates.

Anyone have some authoritative info?

Brian




More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list