phantom files
Florian Diesch
diesch at spamfence.net
Fri Sep 12 21:48:32 UTC 2008
"Mark Haney" <mhaney at ercbroadband.org> wrote:
> Florian Diesch wrote:
>> "Mark Haney" <mhaney at ercbroadband.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Karl Larsen wrote:
>>> .
>>>> Mark I am tired of you making every effort to find something to
>>>> correct that I said. Yes I know about MINNIX and it was VERY Expensive.
>>>> Way out of my price range and it really didn't use the 88386 chip. It
>>>> did some strange things.
>>> I'm not making any effort. It's not like I have time to correct you,
>>> but someone needs to. If you don't know anything about what you're
>>> talking about, then DON'T. AFAIK, MINIX wasn't particularly expensive,
>>> but it was also a /research/ OS and not for general use.
>>
>> Minix is a Unix-like OS for educational purpose made by Andrew
>> S. Tanenbaum.
>>
>> When Linux was invented there were at least three commercial Unices
>> for i386 (SCO Unix, Scenix and Xenix), and 386BSD was in development.
>
> Yeah, you're right. I realized later on that Xenix did have a x86
> version along with SCO. I've never heard of Scenix, though. But it
> does make me interested enough to check into it.
It was a Xenix derivative for Siemens-Nixdorf hardware. Maybe not that
popular outside Europe.
> At the time, though, a good portion of the Unix OS's were on mainframes,
> and since I learned most of my C and PASCAL programming on one, the Unix
> availability on the x86 chipset didn't really register. In the 80s I
> was your typical self-absorbed teen. :)
We are talking about the early 90s, Linux arrived in 1992. The big
time of the Unix workstations, when high-end graphics meant SGI.
Florian
--
<http://www.florian-diesch.de/>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
** Hi! I'm a signature virus! Copy me into your signature, please! **
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list