JFS in Ubuntu

[CLIFFORD ILKAY]

Anthony M. Rasat wrote:
>> On the Ubuntu Unlashed blog, it >has been suggested that users >use the
>> jfs filesystem a opposed to ext3
> 
> If I remembered correctly, JFS performs better in IO throughput than ext3/ext2. Meaning JFS has faster read-write. Also JFS partition can be resized as needed, useful for LVM -- thus could qualify as enterprise filesystem.
> 
> XFS is better in big files read-write than JFS but it is not came resizable so not useful for LVM.
> 
> Now I don't exactly remember result JFS vs ReiserFS, maybe others will fill us in. ReiserFS is resizeable though.

ext3 can also be resized. I always unmount my ext3 filesystems before
resizing to be on the safe side though.
-- 
Regards,

Clifford Ilkay
Dinamis
1419-3266 Yonge St.
Toronto, ON
Canada  M4N 3P6

<http://dinamis.com>
+1 416-410-3326
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3273 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20081017/06fd8085/attachment.bin>