WUBI Vs EXT Partition Installation
ncaew at 126.com
Wed May 7 04:53:56 UTC 2008
I install Ubuntu 8.04 in windows-NTFS partition.
And twice , I install it in EXT3, on same PC.
As same as you doing.
I also see it looks a bit faster in NTFS then in EXT3.
Maybe it true, not a feeling.
IO maybe is faster in Compressed FS .
English is not my mother language, so my idea can not possibly express clearly.
Ary you clear my meaning?
CJ Kelley 写道:
> On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 7:11 PM, Craig Pendlebury <captainslog at gmail.com
> <mailto:captainslog at gmail.com>> wrote:
> I have recently tried installing Ubuntu Hardy Heron on the Windows
> (Vista Home Premium) partition with the WUBI loaded (How sweet an
> install is that?????) and also the same version on it's own (EXT)
> From what I see it looks quite a bit faster on it's own partition.
> Does this sound right? Has anyone else had the same experience?
> Well, wubi uses a virtual partition to setup ubu. I, myself, havent
> noticed much performance difference (but my computers are kida powerful)
More information about the ubuntu-users