Question

[(=?utf-8?q?=60=60-=5F-=C2=B4=C2=B4?=) -- Fernando]

On Thursday 28 February 2008 05:05:35 Alexandra Zaharia wrote:
> ...My point exactly. So keeping this in mind what's wrong with a
> scheme such as the one below for the OP's concrete partitioning need?
> 
> PP = primary partition
> EP = extended partition
> 
> [ ---- PP1: Vista OS ---- ][ ---- PP2: Vista/Linux storage ---- ][
> ---- PP3 /boot---- ][ -------- EP: swap+Linux+... -------- ]
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Alex.

Alex, in today newer systems there is NO need to have boot on a different partition.

-- 
BUGabundo  :o)
(``-_-´´)	http://Ubuntu.BUGabundo.net
Linux user #443786    GPG key 1024D/A1784EBB
My new micro-blog @ http://BUGabundo.net
ps. My emails tend to sound authority and aggressive. I'm sorry in advance. I'll try to be more assertive as time goes by...

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20080301/9ff23aaf/attachment.sig>