beattie at beattie-home.net
Thu Jun 19 02:03:40 UTC 2008
On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 16:44 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Wed, June 18, 2008 4:11 pm, Michael Haney wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Steve Lamb <grey at dmiyu.org> wrote:
> >> Yeah! And they could call it OS/2! No, wait, OS/3!
> > Ah, OS/2 Warp. Now there was an OS.
> Oh yeah. My OS chain on the x86 was DOS -> OS/2 -> Linux (Slack ->
> Debian -> KUbuntu). I bought 3 versions of OS/2. 2.0, 2.(cough) and 3
> Warp. It's still in use in places today. With IBM's backing of Linux I
> wonder why they don't pull a Sun with OS/2 and open source it.
Because it has MS code in it. Originally MS and IBM were collaborating
on OS/2, it was going to be the follow on to Windows, then MS decided it
wanted complete control and developed WINT.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting a bad thing?
Brian Beattie LFS12947 | "Honor isn't about making the right choices.
beattie at beattie-home.net | It's about dealing with the consequences."
www.beattie-home.net | -- Midori Koto
More information about the ubuntu-users