Size Problem
Karl Larsen
k5di at zianet.com
Thu Jun 12 15:18:52 UTC 2008
Derek Broughton wrote:
> Felipe Figueiredo wrote:
>
>
>> On Wednesday 11 June 2008 21:31:59 Karl Larsen wrote:
>>
>>> I have a real problem with /dev/sda5. I put the /karl directories on
>>> it and got a 100% full warning. But for gods sake I had doubled the size
>>> with fdisk and saved it. Here is what df says:
>>> /dev/sda5 8657308 8216216 1316 100% /mnt
>>>
>>> But here is what I did with fdisk and mkfs.ext3 earlier today:
>>>
>>> /dev/sda5 2193 4625 19543041 83 Linux
>>>
>>> according to fdisk.
>>>
>>> Which of these is correct?
>>>
>>>
>> Both of them.
>>
>> One is reporting the partition size, and the other is reporting the
>> filesystem size. Fdisk doesn't mess with filesystems, which is why it's
>> not recommended for those who don't know exactly what they're doing. You
>> could avoid this by using parted, or something higher level like that.
>>
>> You need to resize the filesystem to match the new partition size.
>> man resize2fs is your friend.
>>
>
> While you're right about the partition size, I don't think parted would do
> any better job. However, Karl says he used mkfs - so it really should be
> using the whole partition.
>
I think this happened. I used fdisk to make a new partition and
write it. It did but said the kernel will not use this new partition
until a reboot, or words to that effect.
When I rebooted it looked odd so I made a new file system and now it
looks fine on df. I also remembered I like gparted so got it and I still
like it.
Karl
--
Karl F. Larsen, AKA K5DI
Linux User
#450462 http://counter.li.org.
PGP 4208 4D6E 595F 22B9 FF1C ECB6 4A3C 2C54 FE23 53A7
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list