Question

[Gernot Hassenpflug]

On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 5:29 PM, SYNass IT Ubuntu / Linux
<i-ubux at synass.net> wrote:
>
>
>  On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 15:53 +0900, Gernot Hassenpflug wrote:
>  > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Richard Rudnick <rich at aphroneo.net> wrote:
>  > >
>  > >  On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 10:48 +0800, SYNass IT Ubuntu / Linux wrote:
>  > >
>  > >  > sda2/u = /BOOT Ubuntu, shareable with more Linux'es !?
>  > >
>  > >  I would suggest not using a separate boot partition. Grub can find
>  > >  kernels in more than one place (that is, a boot directory under each
>  > >  os's root). If you have a 64bit processor and would like to have both
>  > >  32bit and 64bit Ubuntu's installed you must do this, since the kernel's
>  > >  for both have the same name.
>  >
>  > Hmm, are you then going to have the boot directory under the root
>  > directory in the root partition for the OS installation?
>
>  Hi Gernot  and Richard
>  I would like to learn and understand better about your suggestion and
>  its results with its contra's and pro's !?
>
>  TIA and cheers, svobi

Me, I like to have many partitions, so I can treat them separately
when doing backups, repairing, and when reconfiguring my systems. I
don't mix /usr/local and /usr on the same partition either, for
example. Cheers, G