aikishugyo at gmail.com
Thu Feb 28 09:16:48 UTC 2008
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 5:29 PM, SYNass IT Ubuntu / Linux
<i-ubux at synass.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 15:53 +0900, Gernot Hassenpflug wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Richard Rudnick <rich at aphroneo.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 10:48 +0800, SYNass IT Ubuntu / Linux wrote:
> > >
> > > > sda2/u = /BOOT Ubuntu, shareable with more Linux'es !?
> > >
> > > I would suggest not using a separate boot partition. Grub can find
> > > kernels in more than one place (that is, a boot directory under each
> > > os's root). If you have a 64bit processor and would like to have both
> > > 32bit and 64bit Ubuntu's installed you must do this, since the kernel's
> > > for both have the same name.
> > Hmm, are you then going to have the boot directory under the root
> > directory in the root partition for the OS installation?
> Hi Gernot and Richard
> I would like to learn and understand better about your suggestion and
> its results with its contra's and pro's !?
> TIA and cheers, svobi
Me, I like to have many partitions, so I can treat them separately
when doing backups, repairing, and when reconfiguring my systems. I
don't mix /usr/local and /usr on the same partition either, for
example. Cheers, G
More information about the ubuntu-users