Erasing files in Ubuntu: other devices still see the files
dotancohen at gmail.com
Sat Feb 9 22:29:27 UTC 2008
On 09/02/2008, debiani386 <debiani386 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dotan Cohen wrote:
> > I have a 1GB USB memory stick. It had photos and text files stored on
> > it, which I deleted on my Ubuntu (KDE) desktop machine. I then copied
> > four video files to the stick and put it in my DVD player (which reads
> > USB sticks as well). The photos and text files were still visible. I
> > then removed the stick and placed in another Ubuntu (also KDE)
> > machine, and all I could see were the video files.
> > What gives? Why are these erased files still visible to other
> > computers? And why can other Ubuntu machines not see the files? How
> > can I be sure that sensitive documents that I've erased are in fact
> > gone?
> because, if you just do a regular delete (ex, right click then delete,
> move it to the trash can, or press the delete key on your keyboard),
> ubuntu will create a .Trash file which is used to recover any deleted
I pressed shift-delete. I did not move the files to the trash. Nor are
there any .files on the drive, so there is no .Trash file on the
drive. At least, not that I can see in Konqueror or Konsole (-a
> If you press Shift + Delete, it will bypass the trash can and will not
> create a .Trash folder. I recommend you do the Shift + Delete action
> only if you know that you will never use the file again.
That is what I always do when removing files from removable media.
> Also, other ubuntu computers, by default, hide any files/folders with a
> "." as their first character. thats probably why ubuntu, by default,
> doesnt show the .Trash folder like other machines do
I do not see a .Trash file in either Ubuntu machine (even when looking
at .files or hidden files) nor on the DVD player (with USB input).
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
More information about the ubuntu-users