Wireless issues, but oddly the opposite of what you normallyhear....

Mark Haney mhaney at ercbroadband.org
Tue Dec 2 21:10:41 UTC 2008


Karl Larsen wrote:

>> No, there's nothing WRONG with the router.  It's just not configured 
>> correctly.  There's a BIG difference there.  The router isn't BAD, it's 
>> badly configured.
>>
>>
>>   
>     Your saying if the router is not broken then it's fine. This is 
> complete false. Most routers with WiFi that do not work are due to poor 
> setup. I see them all the time and after doing a Google search for a pdf 
> manual I set it up right and it works.
> 
> 
> Karl
> 
> 

You know, picking nits with you is really annoying.  I'm saying the 
router isn't BAD as you originally said.  It's not bad.  That implies a 
failure of some kind rendering it unable to properly function when 
correctly configured.

My post above says just that, at least for most people.  The router is 
perfectly fine. It will work properly, IF (and only IF) it is configured 
correctly, which this one is not.

But that doesn't make it a BAD router.

So, I say again, stop picking nits over words.  Your OP is WRONG.  The 
router is not bad.  Just not configured properly.

-- 
Frustra laborant quotquot se calculationibus fatigant pro inventione 
quadraturae circuli

Mark Haney
Sr. Systems Administrator
ERC Broadband
(828) 350-2415

Call (866) ERC-7110 for after hours support




More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list