matthew.flaschen at gatech.edu
Fri Sep 7 07:44:29 UTC 2007
Karl Auer wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 03:19 -0400, Matthew Flaschen wrote:
>> sshfs is] also an option, assuming you don't need to fine-grain which files
>> are accessible, and performance isn't a huge issue.
> Fine grain?
You can't configure which files are accessible. You're just relying on
ordinary unix permissions.
> Access is permitted only to those files and directories that
> your user would have access to via ssh anyway.
Right. This is what I meant by it not being fine-grained. If, for
instance, he wanted to share just a few folders in his desktop home
directory (e.g. a music collection, etc.) with /any/ user (including
untrusted guests) of the laptop, sshfs would be a poor choice.
More information about the ubuntu-users