Static IP address assignments [WAS Re: NIC Settings for IBM Thinkpad T30 / wired & wireless]
SYNass IT Ubuntu / Linux
i-ubux at synass.net
Mon Oct 29 23:22:23 UTC 2007
Hi Derek
Not a native English speaker I cannot follow nor understand properly
what you mean and believe you are somewhat in error !?
Speaking in static IP addresses here it's behind the the Wireless-Modem
Access Point Router !!
>From my ISP I am getting dynamic IP's of course.
Since more than 10 years with mainly OS/2 Warp I have absolutely not
problems to setup as I discuss here ;-) With my little experience in WIN
XP Pro I able to to so too ;-))
Why so complicated / difficult with Linux ???
Host contains what's present
Resolv contains the two / three DNS
But how does Interface look correct for my intention ??
Any constructive assistance and guidance is very appreciated !
TIA for your 2 cents ;-)
Cheers, svobi
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 10:43 -0300, Derek Broughton wrote:
> Res wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Michael R. Head wrote:
> >
> >> That's fine, but most users are getting their host configuration via
> >> DHCP, so going the static address assignment puts you in a small class
> >> of users. That's OK, but the tools are built around the "easy way".
> >
> > You can not sit there and tell us that is fact when you have no clue if it
> > is or not, most Linux users that I've ever come across always setup
> > static IP's, about 2% of teh people I've dealt with use DHCP.
>
> Of course he has a clue. Your assertion is just plain nuts! If 98% of
> computer users were using static IPs, we'd have run out of IPV4 addresses a
> decade ago. Almost everybody uses DHCP because _we have to_. And even if
> you want to configure a local LAN with static private IPs, Michael is
> absolutely correct that it's easier to do it by configuring the DHCP
> server.
> --
> derek
>
>
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list