Idea: Linux for Home
Brian Fahrlander
brian at fahrlander.net
Sun Oct 7 04:17:12 UTC 2007
John Richard Moser wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Consider the following (sorry for top posting but this is organized).
>
> - You can get away with paying a phone/shell support tech $13/hr
>
> - You can get away with paying a tech who goes out $18/hr
>
> - You will probably average $2/hr higher than these for starting
> salaries
>
> - You need one tech on call per hour per volume of traffic per tech in
> that hour; so if a tech can handle 5 calls and you get 10 calls an
> hour between noon and 3pm, you need 2 techs during that time
>
> - You don't need to pay yourself, initially (get a real job)
>
> With 24 hour coverage your minimal costs will fall into $288/day range.
> You could get 2 techs to cover 10 incidents per hour and bring that
> into the $576/10 == $57.60/day range per customer at 1 incident per hour
> per customer; but you won't start with that many issues.
>
> Two important things come from this:
>
> - Every customer does not generate one incident per hour. You may have
> 100 customers and generate 1 incident per hour. This means that
> $288/day becomes $2.88/day cost per customer. Most importantly, new
> customers will invariably have dozens of incidents at first and then
> stfu; a knowledge base can squelch most of these incidents (techs say
> "Here's our support page on this" and that incident takes 2 minutes
> to read, locate, respond; do 30 per hour per tech).
>
> - You won't get the volume you need at first; and when you do you can't
> respond in real time. You need to work by yourself first, and you
> need to deal with support in a ticketed fashion, collecting the
> incident and dealing with it from the queue.
Well, all of this is good, sound advice, *if* I wasn't back to
flint-n-steel here. I have to find money for flyers...I won't be paying
*anyone* for quite a long time.
I came here seven years ago...to take care of Mom...a three hour tour.
:>
But what you've given me can serve as metrics for the eventual
organization; it frames the road ahead- thank you. I have some thinking
to do.
Eventually there will be technical details, but I think I should move
this thread to sounder, until it does. A tiny amount of
central-organization from Canonical could go a long way; I'm starting to
see this as a 'franchise' open to all of us...
Thanks again!
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brian Fahrländer Christian, Conservative, and Technomad
Evansville, IN http://Fahrlander.net/brian
ICQ: 5119262 AOL/Yahoo/GoogleTalk: WheelDweller
------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list