Dual monitor possible?
Liam Proven
lproven at gmail.com
Sat Oct 6 03:22:10 UTC 2007
On 05/10/2007, Brian McKee <brian.mckee at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 05/10/2007, Liam Proven <lproven at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 05/10/2007, Ashley Benton <meggalen at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I think it is build in the motherboard, there is no card just a pink thing
> > > (sorry don't know the name) plug into the motherboard
> >
> > Ah. Now, forgive me, but if you mentioned that before, I didn't notice
> > it. Which is a shame, because I think it's an absolutely critical bit
> > of information.
> >
> > In my experience, on a lot of machines, if you have what are called
> > "integrated graphics" - that means, the graphic chip is built into the
> > motherboard, not on a separate card - then there is circuitry in the
> > motherboard logic which will automatically disable the onboard
> > graphics when you insert a graphics card.
>
> Darn it - I didn't see that either. That would explain the
> 'automatic' change from one card to the other.
>
> I agree - you aren't going to get them both to work at the same time.
>
> On the other hand - isn't her new FX500 a better card than the on the
> motherboard one? It will use the 'real' nvidia drivers not legacy for
> starters... I'd be tempted to use it and ignore the built in one.
You might be right there. I'm no expert on modern 3D cards; all I ever
use 3D for is funky screensavers. :¬)
At a guess, using a card will mean dedicated video RAM, when there's a
fair chance that the integrated graphics "borrow" some system RAM.
That's a definite advantage to a card.
--
Liam Proven • Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/liamproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk • GMail/GoogleTalk/Orkut: lproven at gmail.com
Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 • Cell: +44 7939-087884 • Fax: + 44 870-9151419
AOL/AIM/iChat: liamproven at aol.com • MSN/Messenger: lproven at hotmail.com
Yahoo: liamproven at yahoo.co.uk • Skype: liamproven • ICQ: 73187508
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list