encryption
Felipe Figueiredo
philsf at ufrj.br
Tue May 8 21:23:15 UTC 2007
On Tuesday 08 May 2007 17:59:39 Bart Silverstrim wrote:
> > You could probably solve this with a simple script, depending on your
> > particular configs (maildir x mbox, MUA(s) of choice, interoperability,
etc).
>
> Laptop uses Mail.app, Linux system is using Thunderbird, Outlook is used
> on the Windows system. I would be willing to try out Balsa or KMail if
> they have good IMAP support and support for decent filtering rules...I
> just had the impression that Thunderbird was actively developed and
> flexible.
>
> The main problem I saw was making sure I had a key on all three systems
> that was sync'd up. Lose the key, lose the email. Ideally I could use
> a system that would use an algorithm each could use (like Blowfish) and
> would base it on a password that is prompted, like interactive SSH
> sessions. That way I could encrypt the messages using a password at
> either the startup of the mail client or when encrypting the message,
> and the end recipient would also have a password to decrypt it.
It should be easy to find a way to make each MUA you use to look for the key
in a USB key, should you find this acceptable.
I think (though may be wrong) blowfish is intended for personal security,
while openpgp is intented for secure communication between peers, since they
would both need to know a password in order to use it. Although I would think
it would suit you better semantically, I don't think it will be easy to find
an implemented solution for this in MUAs, since it is semantically apart from
it's main objective (that's also only my opinion). I never heard of such an
implentation, so this is why I think what I suggested is easier. Should you
prove me wrong, I'd surely like to know.
regards
FF
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list