trying to decide whether to use LVM or not
debiani386 at gmail.com
Sat May 5 09:53:07 UTC 2007
Eric S. Johansson wrote:
> I'm putting together a new server with a hardware raid array and I'm debating
> whether or not I want to use LVM and I am looking for good arguments to go in
> either direction.
> The good things about LVM has been the ability to resize partitions as needed.
> It's really been wonderful and once I discovered little magic trick of shrinking
> the filesystem below that of the partition, I haven't had to worry about
> tromping on the end of my filesystem.
> The really bad thing about LVM is that if you lose your root partition and you
> lose your LDM configuration files, you are so completely and totally screwed
> it's not funny. I've been in this position twice and only by sheer miracle have
> I been able to recover the LVM array. In fact I think it's this pain that's
> keeping me from going forward straight to LVM use. If someone could tell me how
> to recover the LVM configuration data without mucking about by hand in a
> partition table, I would be very comfortable using LVM again. All the other
> stuff I can relearn from the manual pages the way I did the first dozen times.
> So how, given an intact LVM managed disk array, how would you recover the
> necessary data enabling you to mount the partitions on that array on your
> system. And answers with "emacs /dev/hda" don't count. :-)
> Thanks in advance for your answers. (This really needs to be a mini how-to)
IMHO i would stick with LVM as it can be resized with out the risk of
loosing your files as compared to a physical file system. Im not sure if
its faster or not, google said it was.
More information about the ubuntu-users