KVM vs XEN vs VMware
lproven at gmail.com
Thu May 3 15:48:54 UTC 2007
On 03/05/07, Tomoki Taniguchi <tomoki.taniguchi at gmail.com> wrote:
> I am curious about which of the the following virtualization options
> people recommend under Feisty?
> 1) KVM
> 2) XEN
> 3) VMware
> Please take into account I will be running this on a laptop with 1.5GB of RAM.
> Primary use will be to run WinXP
> I may want to use it to test other OSs (linux, FreeBSD, NetBSD)
> Is it possible to access and use peripherals which the host OS
> does not support?
Depends up to a point on your hardware.
KVM will only work if you have a CPU which supports virtualisation in
hardware: either Intel's VT or AMD's equivalent.
If you do have this, Xen can virtualise anything. If you don't, Xen
can only paravirtualise suitably-coded OSs, which basically means only
certain supported FOSS OSs.
VMware can virtualise anything, regardless of CPU type. Use this if
you don't have a CPU with hardware virtualisation.
Liam Proven · Blog, homepage &c: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk · GMail/Google Talk/Orkut: lproven at gmail.com
Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 · Mob: +44 7939-087884 · Fax: + 44 870-9151419
AOL/AIM/iChat: liamproven at aol.com · MSN/Messenger: lproven at hotmail.com
Yahoo: liamproven at yahoo.co.uk · Skype: liamproven · ICQ: 73187508
More information about the ubuntu-users