Feisty+1 *PROBABLY WILL NOT* be a LTS release

[Brian Fahrlander]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Michael R. Head wrote:

>> upstart was first deployed in edgy.

    Right; initsysv was first deployed in c. 1975; deep, deep maturity
there.


>> There are always nice features to have. We're also talking about feisty
>> +1, do there's time for this to happen.
> 
>     Is there a hurry?
> 
>> No. I was merely asking a question (to which I've seen no response): Has
>> it actually been decided that feisty+1 will _not_ be an LTS?

    I don't know the by-laws or policies that well, but with each
release 6mo apart, and an LTS spanning 3y, I'd say there's 9 versions
between'em, and we're up to about 3.  Does that sound right?

    I'm excited about the features; it's real, fundamental changes that
AT&T never envisioned....but they ran Unix into the ground in only 10y,
so they never got the chance. Unix as an idea is superb; the culture has
always been a good one, and when it's driven by folks without a business
interest, it's headed into the right direction. (Unlike Redhat, RIP.)

   :)
- --
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Brian Fahrländer                 Christian, Conservative, and Technomad
 Evansville, IN                              http://Fahrlander.net/brian
 ICQ: 5119262                         AOL/Yahoo/GoogleTalk: WheelDweller
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFF6hOu6PLtRzZbdhYRAsIAAJ9EQ4N6D6lzhOsBGgr8zir/mNlN1ACfXfLq
VxWaANSHO84mddThMxCIcvY=
=g13s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----