minimum "/" partition size

[Michael T. Richter]

On Thu, 2007-21-06 at 22:48 -0500, Default User wrote:

> Thanks to Mr. Gray, Mr Richter, and Mr. Lockwood for the advice. Just
> one question, though. Why would a separate /boot partition be ext2
> (non-journaled) rather than ext3 (journaled). Wouldn't ext3 be more
> robust? 


I don't think so, really.  You don't often write to the /boot partition.
You read from it lots.  Why waste the journal space?

-- 
Michael T. Richter <ttmrichter at gmail.com> (GoogleTalk:
ttmrichter at gmail.com)
All really first class designers are both artists, engineers, and men of
a powerful and intolerant temper, quick to resist the least modification
of the plans, energetic in fighting the least infringement upon what
they regard as their own sphere of action. (Nevil Shute)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20070622/3c12e803/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20070622/3c12e803/attachment.sig>