kernel version modules
Vincent Trouilliez
vincent.trouilliez at modulonet.fr
Tue Jan 30 18:35:41 UTC 2007
John Dangler <jdangler at atlantic.net> wrote:
> filtering for linux-image, I show the following as installed
> alsa-base 1.0.10-4ubuntu4
> linux-image-2.6.15-23-386 2.6.15-23.39
> linux-image-2.6.15-26-386 2.6.15-26.47
> linux-image-2.6.15-27-386 2.6.15-27.50
> linux-image-386 2.6.15.25
>
> uname -ra returns : Lunux Nebo 2.6.15-27-386 #1 PREEMPT Fri Dec 8
> 17:51:56 UTC 2006 i686 GNU/Linux
>
> Telling me that the most recent version is 2.6.15-27
> I'm assuming that #1 might mean the slot
> Not sure what PREEMPT means
> Not sure why it says i686, since the kernels say i386 (Although I've
> noticed that there is a 686 version of these kernels).
>
> So, I would mark the other versions
Yep, you can remove the unused ones:
> linux-image-2.6.15-23-386
> linux-image-2.6.15-26-386
> (including the one which just says linux-image-386)
No, you better keep this one. It's not a kernel, it's "meta" package
that will make sure you get newer kernels, should any be released for
Dapper in the future. If you remove this package, you might miss future
kernel updates.
> for _removal_ or _complete removal_ ?
Both options will uninstall the packages. The only difference (to the
best of my knowledge and experience...), is that if you do a "complete"
uninstall, the package will actually be deleted from the system, whereas
a "normal" uninstall", will keep the .deb file in a cache somewhere
in /var I think. So, if you don't have broadband and think you "might"
want to re-install an older kernel at some point for whatever reason
(debug a problem or whatever), then better to chose a "normal"
uninstallation, to save you some download time.
But if you have broadband, the download time is very small, so it
doesn't really matter what option you chose, unless you want to free a
few megabytes of disk space.
HTH
--
Vince
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list