which is better between Beagle, Google Desktop, and Spotlight?
webmaster at monzell.com
Mon Jan 8 15:39:13 UTC 2007
I like spotlight too, but for some reason, it's quite slow for me.
However, being that I run Mac OS X on a macbook (with a 4200 RPM
drive), I am not quite surprised.
Google Desktop is quite good, but I am not crazy with displaying the
results in the browser. I rather have it display in a explorer-like
window (albeit with some enchancements).
I have not tried Beagle. I'll poke around with and see how that works
On Jan 8, 2007, at 3:21 AM, James Gray wrote:
> Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
>> (I asked this on debian-user without too many replies)
>> I hear good things about Spotlight and hardly ever used Google
>> and Beagle, so out of curiosity do wonder about how they compare with
>> each other in terms of memory usage, indexing speed, and breadth of
> I've used both Beagle and Spotlight. Spotlight is definitely
> faster and more accurate (it returns more relevant results). It's
> a bit hard to compare though as the data sets on each of the
> machines was different. Beagle is written in Mono, which IMHO kinda
> sucks a bit. I wonder if there would be much of a speed
> improvement if it was written in something like C++ instead. I've
> certainly noticed speed improvements in code I've ported from .Net
> (Mono) to C++. But millage varied significantly depending on what
> you're trying to do.
> One of the REALLY nice features of Spotlight is it's tight
> integration with Apple Mail and other OSX components (which M$
> extended even further by adding Spotlight hooks into M$-Office).
> It's really nice to be able to find a single message from the
> thousands in my mail box from typing in two words :)
> Beagle seemed to be a bit of resource hog while it was indexing
> whereas (again - is this a failure of design, or a side-effect of
> Mono??). I haven't noticed a similar slow-down on OSX with
> Spotlight. Given that Spotlight was written "by Apple for Apple"
> it consequently is bound to work a little more efficiently than an
> universal search tool such as Beagle.
> Having said that though, Beagle is a very useful tool and well
> worth the time and effort to set it up if you find yourself (like
> me) wondering what header file had a particular declaration on and
> couldn't be bothered opening each one until you found what you're
>> Also watch out for Tracker (www.tracker-project.org) which might soon
>> rule over all of them.
> Indeed - it looks promising. FWIW, Spotlight already supports a
> lot of the data sources the tracker project hasn't implemented yet
> (such as e-mail, projects, contacts etc...). Still, it's certainly
> a step in the right direction :)
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/
More information about the ubuntu-users